A Resource Blog on MSHA and Above Ground Aggregate Mines

Navigating This Website:

Hi,

Thanks for stopping by to take a look! We hope that you will find some useful information as you browse this site. We welcome you as part of this informal group where we can communicate about what is going on in the industry regarding MSHA. Please feel free to leave your comments (but remember that MSHA does read this site too.) To contact us through the phone or email with your stories and concerns, call Cary or Kathy Matthews, at 541-536-1771 or 541-410-4673 (Cary's cell). Our fax number is 541-536-1772. You can email us at: lapineredimixinc@hotmail.com

New blog posts are featured on this page, and other information is found by category by clicking on the pages links above.

We encourage you to join up with your local aggregate association, because there is strength in numbers. If there is not one in your area yet, please consider forming one.

Take care, and remember to be in contact with your state officials to voice your concerns about MSHA. Our tax dollars pay for MSHA, which is under the Department of Labor. Our fine money goes into the general fund, and we cannot afford to keep paying out costly fines on the more and more frequent trivial citations to essentially support government spending. At least that is how I feel about it.

~ Kathy


______________________________________________

Friday, February 19, 2010

MSHA's Rules to Live By Focus and H.R. 2768:


This inspection season, MSHA will be focusing on air and noise contamination. Learn as much as you can about these requirements, and fix such hazards at your site.

Other focuses for this year include the following areas, and tickets are being written in these areas:

56.9101 - Operating Speeds and Control of Equipment
56.12017 - Work on Power Circuits
56.14101 (a) - Brake Performance
56.14105 - Procedures During Repairs or Maintenance
56.14130 (g) & 56.1413 (a) - Seat Belt Use
56.14205 - Machinery, Equipment, & Tools Used Beyond Design
56.14207 - Parking Procedures for Unattended Equipment
56.15005 - Safety Belts and Lines
56.16002 - Bins, Hoppers, Silos, Tanks and Surge Piles
56.20011 - Barricades and Warning Signs
57.3360 - Use of Ground Support
Also: Staying Clear of Suspended Loads


Link to H.R. 2768:
Supplemental Mine Improvement & New Emergency Responsibility Act of 2007 ---not brand new info, but it seems that this is what the enforcement focus currently is based on: http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/88xx/doc8817/hr2768.pdf

No Citations? You may be in for a lot of trouble:


Does your small sand and gravel pit have a history of safety, with inspector visits resulting in zero citiations? Congratulations! However, that very fact may be making you a target for MSHA to come down hard on you the next time they inspect.

Frank Adkins at Safeco, Inc. http://www.safeproinc.com has posted several articles this week about this very subject. Safepro, Inc. used to post a section on their website about mine operators who were outstanding in the zero or very low citation department. Frank now feels as if this proved to be a list for MSHA to target, and has suspended this practice.

There is more. Frank also posted that he has been told by a source inside MSHA that inspectors who make a visit to a mine site and do not write any citations are required to submit a report to their district manager how they justified that no tickets were deserved. He suggests that we all write to our senators and state representatives and inform them of this abuse of power.

Here in Oregon, we do know of a case where the inspector went out and did his job, and found nothing wrong at the site. He warned the mine operator to watch out, because his supervisor would be out to take a look. Sure enough, the supervisor came out the next day and wrote four S&S citations. There is something really wrong here, and apparently it is not always with the individual inspector.

I am also noticing a change in terminology. Last year, when we had a younger inspector in our area who was abrasive, aggressive and writing a lot of unfair citations, we were told by his superiors that the man was either a) just doing his job or b) was a "rouge" employee who they would talk to and tell him to settle down. Now, the supervisors are telling mine owners and operators that the inspectors who do not write tickets are "lazy" and are not doing their jobs. Wow.

This also makes me wonder if eliminating the Small Mines positions was due to the fact that this would eliminate one more person testifying that everything was fine at a mine site when they were there. In one way, the inspectors who give out two $100 citations may feel as if they are doing us a favor in the long run, but it doesn't really work out that way either, because of the pattern of violations clause. MSHA has it set up all in their favor, and continues to rethink all the little details to keep us right where they want us. They get us coming and going. It is unjust, to say the least, and very expensive for us, the mine owners.

I did a copy and past on the next part, from Safepro, Inc.'s website, because I feel that this letter to Frank clearly spells out what is now happening, and the frustration it brings to those who are just trying to make a living and provide jobs to those in their communities. The identifying names and company names were withheld so that the author would not get into further trouble with MSHA at this time:

"Frank,

Just read your comments on the "Zero" citation "witch hunt" that MSHA is currently implementing.

We here at ******* had a similar problem last month when the inspector showed up here. He came in on a ******* afternoon when we were shut down for the winter. He seemed to have trouble understanding why we were not producing since the day was fairly nice by January standards. I explained that we would not be running due to the low volume of sales and the weather uncertainty. He did a few looks at things, walked around the plant a little and said that he would be back tomorrow and hang noise and dust monitors on the only guy that I had working; which he was disappointed because he wanted to be able to use several guys for monitoring.

The next morning, after he had put his monitors in place he made a comment to me that really pi**ed me off, saying that he was researching our history and could not believe that we had not had citation in over 2? years. He said there is no way we are that good, and he felt that past inspectors were just lazy and didn't want to do their job.

At that point I knew that I was in trouble, and it was not going to be a good day. By the end of the day we a 1 non-S&S citation and 2 S&S citations for not having or implementing fall protection when a haul truck operator does a pre-shift on his ***** A-35C articulating haul truck each morning.

Needless to say I was extremely upset with him since we stress 3 points of contact just as the Operator's Manual directs us to do, his comment was that in his opinion we do not do that, and he claims to have seen me slip after demonstrating our practice to him (while wearing fall protection).

His next comment was he does not understand why "******'s Site Managers get so upset when he writes us a citation, and besides that I know you will contest these citations anyway, ****** always contests citations."

Needless to say he did not leave here without getting a real earful from me.

Hope all is well with you and Miss Blue.

Site Manager (Institute Graduate)


$afepro has removed names, dates, and times to prevent identification of the site. Here is the Manager's e-mail reply to my request to post the above.

Frank,

You may do anything with this e-mail that you want, and I wish I could truly express my distaste for MSHA at this time. I told the inspector that there was a time when we may not have liked having them come to our pit but after they left we knew that anything they found unsafe was brought to the attention of management and we were all the better for it. This is no longer the case we (being average Joe Miner) despise them coming in now because they don't care about average Joe Miner, they are only concerned about writing enough citation's to pay for their salaries and couldn't care any less about the miners, because now some of the ridiculous things that they are writing are causing more hazards then anything they are correcting. I wish I knew what the answer was to stop this bull**it that is going on with these inspectors.

Register for May 10-14 Institute at http://www.safeproinc.com"

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Links to February 2010 News Articles on MSHA:

This one is a "must read" ~
MSHA Unwarrantable Failure Criteria Under Spotlight

by Adele Abrams, in Rock Products.com
http://rockproducts.com/safety/msha_unwarrantable_failure_0210/


Sorting Out Mine Safety
by Rick Markley, in Rock Products.com
http://rockproducts.com/news/agg1_safety_0210/


Quarry News.com Database on MSHA Articles and News:

Type "MSHA" in the search box at the top right hand corner of the page.
http://www.quarrynews.com/ME2/Audiences/dirmod.asp?sid=&type=AdvancedSearch&nm=Advanced&mod=Site+Search&level=2&p=1

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Getting the Attendtion of our Federal Senators:


OIAA Board Member Jerry Davidson

On January 8, in Oakridge, Oregon, OIAA board member Jerry Davidson attended a town hall meeting held by Senator Ron Wyden. Jerry was chosen as one of the people allowed to submit a question, and he brought up issues that the aggregate industry was having with MSHA.

On January 28, Jerry, Andrew Siegmund, and Dan Kaufmann. along with Kim Redding of N Compliance, attended a meeting with Juine Chada, a Field Representative for Senator Wyden's office to go over the issues. You can email Ms. Chada with your information and experiences at this email address: Juine_Chada@wyden.senate.gov, or call her at 541-431-0229.


On Wednesday, February 3, 2009, Jessica Adamson, the Business Liaison for Senator Jeff Merkley's office, came to the OIAA meeting as a guest. Jessica gathered information from our board members, and is going to report back to Senator Merkley bringing our issues with MSHA into focus. Jessica's email is: Jessica_Adamson@merkley.senate.gov, and her phone number is 503-326-3386.


Link to Jim Sharpe's column in Rock Products magazine:
http://rockproducts.com/safety/rock_congress_msha_0110/